Buscar


Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.rights.license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0 es_ES
dc.contributor Ximena Atilano Carsi es_ES
dc.creator Iris Del Carmen Nieves Anaya es_ES
dc.date 2014-11
dc.date.accessioned 2018-12-14T17:06:26Z
dc.date.available 2018-12-14T17:06:26Z
dc.date.issued 2014-11
dc.identifier.uri http://ri-ng.uaq.mx/handle/123456789/916
dc.description La sobrehidratación presente en los pacientes nefrópatas es factor de riesgo de morbi-mortalidad, por lo que es importante su diagnóstico y tratamiento. Los vectores de impedancia bioeléctrica (VIBE), permiten realizar estimaciones objetivas del estado de hidratación. El objetivo de este estudio fue comparar la eficiencia de VIBE contra los parámetros clínicos convencionales para ajustar el ultrafiltrado y alcanzar el peso seco en pacientes en hemodiálisis. es_ES
dc.description The over-hydration in patients with nephropathy is a risk factor for morbidity and mortality, so its diagnosis and treatment is important. Bioelectrical impedance vectors (VIBA) allow objective estimates of hydration status. The purpose of this study was to compare the efficiency of VIBA against conventional clinical parameters to adjust the ultrafiltration and achieve dry weight in hemodialysis patients. The study included 47 adult patients who were randomized into two groups. In group A, the dry weight was adjusted according to BIVA to reach euhydration. In group B, the dry weight was adjusted according to conventional clinical parameters. Monthly measurements of bioelectrical impedance were performed in all patients pre and post hemodialysis for four months. At baseline, no significant differences between groups were found. The basal VIBA pre and post-hemodialysis indicated overhydration, with no significant differences between them. After four months of intervention, the vectors belonging to group A in the post-dialysis showed the achievement of dry weight, as opposed to post-dialysis vectors corresponding to group B , which remained in the bottom of the ellipses (p <0.009 A vs B). A significant difference at baseline and in final vectors in group A (p <0.001) was found. Clinical edema decreased (group A: 95.7% base line vs 0% final, group B: 83.3% base line vs 54.2% final, p <0.001). Initially, 82.6% and 95.8% of patients were overhydrated in group A and B respectively. The dry weight was achieved in 95.7% of patients in group A and 4.2% in group B. Analysis of BIVA is a useful tool to adjust dry weight in hemodialysis patients, being superior to clinical parameters commonly used for this purpose. es_ES
dc.format Adobe PDF es_ES
dc.language.iso Español es_ES
dc.relation.requires Si es_ES
dc.rights Acceso Abierto es_ES
dc.subject Hemodialysis es_ES
dc.subject Hemodiálisis es_ES
dc.subject Impedance es_ES
dc.subject Impedancia es_ES
dc.subject Vector es_ES
dc.subject Vectores es_ES
dc.subject.classification MEDICINA Y CIENCIAS DE LA SALUD es_ES
dc.title Uso de vectores de Impedancia Bioeléctrica para el ajuste de peso seco en pacientes sometidos a hemodiálisis es_ES
dc.type Tesis de maestría es_ES
dc.creator.tid curp es_ES
dc.contributor.tid curp es_ES
dc.creator.identificador NIAI890205MQTVNR03 es_ES
dc.contributor.identificador AICX790801MDFTRM05 es_ES
dc.contributor.role Colaborador es_ES
dc.degree.name Maestría en Ciencias de la Nutrición Humana es_ES
dc.degree.department Facultad de Ciencias Naturales es_ES
dc.degree.level Maestría es_ES


Ficheros en el ítem

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem